Today's hottest deals

Foxconn 945 7MC Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn 945 7MC Series  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '21 at 21:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 56.8
36% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 56.9
8% 57 Pts
64-Core 57.5
4% 57.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Nvidia(10DE 0545) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 1.9
4% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 4
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380215A 80GB-$50
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 14 28 46 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 54.6
Write 54.1
Mixed 31
SusWrite 23.1
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 945 7MC Series Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn 945 7MC Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback