Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0EM003KLD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0EM003KLD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3703
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 15:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 98.1
37% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 378
35% 291 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3703) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 27
17% 21.1 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 21.8
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512G8L 512GB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L02N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 53 161 156 53 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1,120
Write 796
Mixed 740
SusWrite 178
157% 708 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 36.6
130% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 217
195% 294 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback