Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509DA
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 08:32
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 36.9
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 125
42% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 390
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$67
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 223 244 238 238 522 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 553
Write 508
Mixed 500
SusWrite 274
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 49.5
163% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 339
262% 355 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 209%
Realtek USB 3.2 Device 240GB
106GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 242 249 235 210 262 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 366
Write 429
Mixed 336
SusWrite 230
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 24.6
75% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 0.2
58% 141 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback