Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 19:46
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 273
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 944
90% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.6% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 69.5
43% 54.8 fps
MRender 41.9
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 56.7
42% 50.8 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 717.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,465
Write 1,796
Mixed 1,732
374% 1,664 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 51.1
173% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1,226
915% 1,213 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A4G8BAF-062E:B 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 27.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback