Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 04:00
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 834
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 85.4
44% 63.8 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 58
Splatting 33
36% 44.8 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1160
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,266
Write 1,450
Mixed 1,093
284% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 25
94% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 489
453% 716 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 6R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 48% 23 336 272 60 16" 1536 960 APPA044 Color LCD
History: Score 22: 3R 2G 1B | Score 37: 6R 1G 4B
Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback