Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16GF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2PC
MotherboardMSI MS-16GF  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 06:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 487
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1108) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 7.06
3% 8.65 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.22
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SB mSATA SSD 60GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 46 23 38 32 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
Read 381
Write 11.8
Mixed 100
SusWrite 34.7
28% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 8.4
51% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 8.6
30% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 50%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
908GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 103 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 98
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 106
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 1302 PSD38G1600L2S 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GF Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback