Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 23:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4650 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 92.5
46% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 373
33% 279 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490
HP(103C 90B8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SB mSATA SSD 60GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 108 98 112 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
Read 338
Write 111
Mixed 130
SusWrite 105
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 15.3
85% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 9.4
34% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%
General UDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 10.5
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 11
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback