Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5517

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5517  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5517
Memory0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091130
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 20:41
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon TF-20
Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 17.5
2-Core 15.1
20% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 17.8
8-Core 15.3
2% 16.5 Pts
64-Core 18.7
1% 18.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Acer(1025 028D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.45 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 59.6
Mixed 56.6
43% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.27
59% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 M4 70T2864QZ3-CE6 3GB
333, 333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.3
5% 1.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 2.4
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5517 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5517

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback