Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5517

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5517  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5517
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 02:37
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon TF-20
Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Memory 21.7
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 18.9
14% 20.4 Pts
4-Core 17.8
8-Core 19.3
2% 18.5 Pts
64-Core 19
1% 19 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Acer(1025 028D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.8
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 42 41 36 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 54.4
Write 44.2
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 38
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HYMP125S64CP8-S6 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.32% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 0.7
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 308
13% 308 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.32%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5517 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5517

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback