Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 15:35
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 38.7
28% 38.8 Pts
4-Core 76.7
8-Core 81.2
10% 78.9 Pts
64-Core 89.4
6% 89.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.09 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 3
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 115 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 148
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 125
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 82%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.8 3.4 3.1 2.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 0.3
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.1
4% 4.55 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AM1M-S2H Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback