Today's hottest deals

Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP900X4D-A03CA
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120919
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 02:40
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 37
27% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 45.4
8-Core 23.2
5% 34.3 Pts
64-Core 38.3
2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 0.88
1% 1.61 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.43
1% 1.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 SMG2 126GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 6.8 6 4.4 5.5 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 343
Write 15.3
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 8
21% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 6.7
24% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 46%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
14GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 14
Mixed 12
SusWrite 16.1
20% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.6
110% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3.1
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback