Today's hottest deals

Samsung R530/R730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung R530/R730  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R530/R730
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 18:27
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 12.8
2-Core 17.4
25% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 37.3
8-Core 41.6
5% 39.4 Pts
64-Core 34.2
2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Sanyo(144D C06D) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2104
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.36 fps
MRender 0.33
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.34 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.29%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 106 125 161 161 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.8% Poor
Read 87.3
Write 77.1
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 134
20% 87 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 7.9
25% 9.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 94.9
72% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 114%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
368GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 19.9
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 20.4
25% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R530/R730 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R530/R730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback