Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B360 M AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 15:08
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 259
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 757
79% 635 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVME SSD 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0205B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 271 325 160 200 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,421
Write 913
Mixed 381
SusWrite 231
162% 737 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 16.8
120% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 28
115% 279 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 123%
Great: 193%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 00.02C.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 134 133 136 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 135
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 86%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
265GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 94.8
Write 93.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 84.6
102% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360 M AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback