Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E5E-K08FR
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '20 at 12:13
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 25.8 2-Core 23.9 34% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 31 8-Core 39.7 4% 35.3 Pts	64-Core 34.7 2% 34.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C708) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.15% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.62 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.15% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 89 88 95 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 36.7 Write 96.2 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 89.3 46% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 62%
Kingston DT Elite G2 64GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 15GB free, PID 16d5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 23 17 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 15.7 Mixed 4 SusWrite 21.2 21% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GB 3,608 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	78x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	190x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $38Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	23x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350