Today's hottest deals

Digibras NH4CU53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDigibras NH4CU53  (all builds)
MotherboardDigiboard NH4CU53
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 20:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 57.2
36% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 55.4
8% 56.2 Pts
64-Core 57
4% 57 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Device(1297 2032) 777MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 1
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.6
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 120G 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC1A254P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 322 318 287 177 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 445
Write 359
Mixed 347
SusWrite 261
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 11
72% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 18.9
36% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH4CU53 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Digibras NH4CU53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback