Today's hottest deals

Intel Burnside

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel Burnside  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 0.00390625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 04:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 74
2-Core 140
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 404
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 1476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 18.9
16% 18.1 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 20.8
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 107GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 46 50 49 31 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 83.5
Write 75
Mixed 78
SusWrite 42
16% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 6.6
20% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 20%
52netbar iShareDisk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 50 31 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 83.8
Write 60.5
Mixed 78
SusWrite 43.6
50% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 5.9
947% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MXIC 25L3205 1x36GB
1 of 7 slots used
36GB FLASH 33 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Burnside Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel Burnside

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback