Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 06:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 129
56% 91 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 385
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 50.3
45% 62.2 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 46.9
39% 47 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 111 114 113 114 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 161
Write 215
Mixed 184
SusWrite 110
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 33.1
106% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 50.7
42% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
659GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 115 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 172
Write 152
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 114
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 4.9
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback