Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '20 at 20:32
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Memory 89 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,006 97% 799 Pts	64-Core 1,436 89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,702 Write 2596 Mixed 1939 537% 2,412 MB/s	4K Read 71.4 4K Write 189 4K Mixed 101 338% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 518 DQ Write 1,247 DQ Mixed 231 362% 665 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Kingdian S280 1TB 769 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 152GB free Firmware: Q1211A SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 439 258 140 135 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 430 Mixed 363 SusWrite 254 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 52.9 174% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 85.1 96% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 120%
Netac 960GB 960GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 217GB free Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 77 9.7 14 103 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 499 Write 412 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 105 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 0.6 39% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 85.5 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 0.7 12% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 104%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$79 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 879GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 103 107 106 107 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 154 Write 156 Mixed 108 SusWrite 105 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 100%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$63 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 521GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 132 134 135 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 121 Write 126 Mixed 70 SusWrite 133 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 4x8GB 965 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 43.7 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 42.6 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 28 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 39.6 90% 31.5 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $165Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,338x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $130Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	895x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 65,928 samples	857x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	589x
RTX 3080Nvidia $751Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	527x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	415x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	350x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	283x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $79Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	269x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	250x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	150x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $57Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $954

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350