Today's hottest deals

Asus WS X299 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 22:05
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9800X-$545
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 939
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,448
90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 105
87% 109 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 105
Splatting 100
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$62
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 371 362 356 347 347 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,581
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,522
SusWrite 413
369% 1,661 MB/s
4K Read 71.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 98.9
336% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 1,069
DQ Mixed 1167
843% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 279%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
109GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 496 495 494 493 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 495
Mixed 448
SusWrite 494
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 65.8
234% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 140%
Great: 131%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 138 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 135
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 100%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
276GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 118
Write 106
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 107
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 36.7
136% 47.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 12.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 PRO Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback