Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 08:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870 R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Memory 23.5
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 43.8
28% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 90.6
8-Core 201
17% 146 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8265) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 13.7
8% 10.9 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 6.74
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-256G-100 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 71 52 80 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 394
Write 224
Mixed 154
SusWrite 89
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 21
68% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 116
97% 141 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MD-8 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 295
14% 295 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 MT Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback