Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite C640  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 05:31
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Memory 36.8
1-Core 46
2-Core 42.4
28% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 24.2
6% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 43.4
3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FCF0) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.78 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.85 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 37 35 41 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 40.8
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 35.6
25% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
133GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 17 16 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 24
Write 24
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 15.6
27% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 19%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB
51GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 16 16 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.7% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 16.6
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 15.6
24% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C640 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback