Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWAA
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 95.4 42% 69.2 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 143 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 263GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 43 27 24 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 8.5 Write 15.8 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 30.1 13% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 46%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 766GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 19 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 19.9 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.3 75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 80CE M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.2% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	120x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	75x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $24Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350