Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101004
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 134
65% 103 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 366
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 232 87 68 75 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.4% Good
Read 250
Write 243
Mixed 230
SusWrite 125
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 36
119% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 172
135% 187 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 126%
WD Red 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$126
361GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 58 57 59 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 83.2
Write 82.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 57.4
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
1.5TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 156 156 155 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 100
Write 118
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 156
158% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.6
342% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 0.7
294% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 22.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback