Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B250M-D2V-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B250M-D2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-D2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 15:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 208
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 322
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 37.7
30% 38.2 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 27
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 25 24 26 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 80%
WD Red 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$126
297GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 49 45 46 46 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 52.7
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 44.6
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2324WC.002 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.5% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-D2V-CF Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D2V-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback