Today's hottest deals

Samsung R510/P510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung R510/P510  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R510/P510
Memory0.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080820
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 49.5
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 38.7
27% 37.8 Pts
4-Core 23.2
8-Core 33.6
4% 28.4 Pts
64-Core 41.9
3% 41.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 84.8
Write 93.3
Mixed 121
22% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 7.5
28% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 27.8
DQ Mixed 42.4
41% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.9 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
8% 6.82 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 8%
Multi Flash Reader 4GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Read 15.4
Write 0.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 4.4
5% 5.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 0.1
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R510/P510 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R510/P510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback