Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate 4200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate 4200  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Grapevine
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 11:35
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T1400
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 10.3
2-Core 13.7
13% 16.7 Pts
4-Core 13.8
8-Core 11.1
2% 12.5 Pts
64-Core 16.5
1% 16.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.8 4.6 4 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 4.7
3% 3.77 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 24%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
52GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 7.8 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 20.9
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 17
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback