Today's hottest deals

Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 20:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 140
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 229
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 32.9
29% 31.4 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 32.9
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 266 268 272 271 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 394
Mixed 383
SusWrite 267
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 41.7
149% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 190
153% 216 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 147 147 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 147
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 107%
Samsung STORY Station 3TB
1TB free, PID 5f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Read 39
Write 39.6
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 40.1
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback