Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 242
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 8.4
7% 9.1 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 8.4
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$28
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 24 24 47 97 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 424
Write 291
Mixed 274
SusWrite 77.3
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 17.1
63% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 86.4
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 36.4
40% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2133C11 Series 2133C11 Series 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 25
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 15.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback