PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121010 |
Uptime | 47 Days |
Run Date | Nov 17 '19 at 10:24 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.6%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 49 27 40 78 35 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
178GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
78GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 184x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 166x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 104x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 81x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 71x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 58x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $322 |