Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 18:53
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 390
54% 397 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36FA) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 170 177 176 170 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 332
Write 239
Mixed 256
SusWrite 167
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 40.1
151% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 214
166% 225 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 181 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 114
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 181
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97N-WIFI Builds (Compare 576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97N-WIFI - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback