Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 780
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 780  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '16 at 23:08
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 83.2
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 84.7
8-Core 86.6
11% 85.6 Pts
64-Core 86.5
5% 86.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2619) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.78
2% 2.18 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.15 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 223
Write 127
Mixed 128
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 10.4
67% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 10.3
13% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 114%
Lexar microSD RDR 64GB
5GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Read 5.9
Write 5.65
Mixed 5.73
7% 5.76 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.77
70% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 780 Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback