Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardGigabyte 8I945GZME-RH
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060705
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 07:18
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 52.4
1-Core 16.9
2-Core 31.8
25% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 26.5
8-Core 25.3
4% 25.9 Pts
64-Core 12.9
1% 12.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VM100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 40 42 39 37 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 46.7
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 38.2
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.2% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.2
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback