Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory65.6 GB free of 40.0029 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 15:54
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6146
None, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 63.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 612
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.7 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 8
SusWrite 7.5
6% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 2.7
478% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
500GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 8 8 8 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Read 8
Write 8.2
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 8
6% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 4.1
696% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 72GB
null MHz
3968, 32767, 28161, 8834 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 33.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 5
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback