Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime40.6 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 145
56% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 278
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2 2.1 2.3 1.8 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Read 6.9
Write 5
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 2.1
4% 5.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 97%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
335GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 8.5 8.4 8.1 7.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 41
Write 14.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 7.9
14% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 93%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 86GB
65GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 6.8 5.4 7.4 7.8 8.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 102
Write 3.7
Mixed 14
SusWrite 7.3
23% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
3968, 4224 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback