Today's hottest deals

HP 500-210qe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-210qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 06:18
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 104
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 366
53% 388 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.5
18% 20 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 55 70 60 58 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 65
SusWrite 64.8
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 2TB
204GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 80 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 79.7
97% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
19GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 13 14 12 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 14
27% 22 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.6
95% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655409-150-HYCG Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-210qe Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-210qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback