Today's hottest deals

HP p6-2310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP p6-2310  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '19 at 06:43
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3420 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 86.8
43% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 82.1
8-Core 85
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 68.7
4% 68.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D Graphics
HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 113 108 111 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 131
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 113
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655409-150-HYCG Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2310 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback