Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 08:52
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 514
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 50 49 44 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 46.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 49.1
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 48%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
126GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 86 81 85 93 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 80.5
Write 104
Mixed 52
SusWrite 92.5
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 74%
Innostor Innostor 67GB
59GB free, PID 0903, Jetflash 700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 26 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 24.6
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
24% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2P2G64CB8HC9N-DG 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback