Today's hottest deals

Asus N551ZU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N551ZU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551ZU
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 10:16
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7600P APU (2014 M.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 97.2
41% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 223D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 9.81
6% 8.3 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 8.48
6% 7.81 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 161 66 54 56 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 414
Write 275
Mixed 296
SusWrite 108
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 28.7
105% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 145
125% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.C2GCZ.9K30C Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N551ZU Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N551ZU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback