Today's hottest deals

Asus N551ZU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus N551ZU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551ZU
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 10:08
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7600P APU (2014 M.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 86.2
43% 68 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 153
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 223D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 17.6
10% 17.5 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 23.3
16% 18.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 210 197 193 186 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 399
Write 259
Mixed 234
SusWrite 199
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 27.7
110% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 185
151% 215 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 128%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
135GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 89.6
62% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N551ZU Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N551ZU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback