Today's hottest deals

HP t520 Flexible Series TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t520 Flexible Series TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21EF
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '19 at 18:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-212JC SOC R2E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 53.1
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 39.2
26% 37 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 41.1
6% 41.4 Pts
64-Core 41.3
3% 41.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2E Graphics
HP(103C 21EF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.44
0% 1.39 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.35
2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LSS-32L6G-HP 32GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DS51704
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 66 55 46 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 376
Write 80.9
Mixed 118
SusWrite 58.5
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 17.8
69% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 99
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 90.7
68% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.9
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t520 Flexible Series TC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t520 Flexible Series TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback