Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 840 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 12:20
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 130
60% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 201
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 198F) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3993
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 5.97
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.48
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LSS-32L6G-HP 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: DS51702 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 312
Write 87.6
Mixed 138
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 6.92
64% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 32.8
42% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 81.7
Mixed 46.4
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.08
14% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 19.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G1 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback