Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170117
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 18:46
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 89.6
49% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 95.7
13% 94.9 Pts
64-Core 97.2
6% 97.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 14.502.1013.0
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 5.91
3% 5.27 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.61
3% 4.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB
82GB free
Firmware: 3.AHG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 20 37 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 45.5
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 25.8
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9.9 11 15 34 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 25.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 20.3
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-018.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback