Today's hottest deals

MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 46.5
31% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 29.3
8-Core 52
5% 40.7 Pts
64-Core 47.5
3% 47.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.72
3% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.39
3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 9.6 20 15 21 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 30
Write 48.9
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 20.6
22% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
274GB free
Firmware: 3.CNK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 63 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 55
Write 57.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 63
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-018.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback