Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 22:22
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 85.9
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 98.3
56% 86 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 175
25% 182 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.6
18% 19.4 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 24 48 62 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 34.2
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 51.4
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
36GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 129 128 137 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 128
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 84%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 4TB
17GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 94
Write 114
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 125
146% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
0GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.8
Write 69.5
Mixed 51.7
83% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 56%
ADATA HD710A 1TB
5GB free, PID a52a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.3
Write 99.8
Mixed 35.8
94% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 14.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 15.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3 - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback