Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 02:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 71
2-Core 95.3
54% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 99.1
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 3.06
3% 3.14 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 94 94 100 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 81.3
Write 66.5
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 87.6
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%
ADATA HD710A 1TB
699GB free, PID a52a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 29 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 29
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 28.3
34% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-034.A 99U5474-041.A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback