Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4.12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.12GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 25.4 32% 39.8 Pts	4-Core 29.9 8-Core 35.3 4% 32.6 Pts	64-Core 35.9 2% 35.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series Sapphire(174B 0370) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.19 0% 0.23 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160021A 160GB-$75 919 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 5.6 5.1 6 6.1 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Read 7.3 Write 8.2 Mixed 5.4 SusWrite 6.6 5% 6.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 31%
WD WD1600JB-00GVC0 160GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 149GB free Firmware: 15.05R15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 8.1 12 15 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 12.3 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 13.2 10% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 128, 4096 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.58% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.58% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM