Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '16 at 19:47
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 326
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics Family
Asus(1043 844D) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 1.88
2% 3.02 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 5.17
3% 3.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 509
Write 106
Mixed 160
56% 258 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 6.63
92% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 6.03
44% 106 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
44GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 81.1
Write 78.2
Mixed 75.4
59% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.42
109% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
8GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 77.1
64% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.26
106% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback