Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 15:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 408
54% 405 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Zotac(19DA 2199) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.31
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 302 312 313 307 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 380
Write 352
Mixed 314
SusWrite 319
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 39.7
127% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 41.5
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 55.8
49% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 124%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
931GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 194 195 197 197 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 192
Mixed 110
SusWrite 196
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.7
345% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback