PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0RW199 |
Memory | 58.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120430 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 03 '19 at 20:14 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
Nvidia(10DE 065B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
9.49%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 142 143 142 143 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
266GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 141 142 142 142 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 141 142 142 142 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
889GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 382 388 392 393 392 MB/s
|
89.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $235 |