Today's hottest deals

Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43% Average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 92.8
49% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 45.7
8-Core 44.5
6% 45.1 Pts
64-Core 42.1
3% 42.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Sanyo(144D C597) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.41 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.48
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 30 44 42 24 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 68.5
Write 60.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 34
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
ACASIS 750GB
520GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 22.2
19% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 58%
Multiple Card Reader 4GB
4GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9.3 9.4 9.4 8.7 9.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 7
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 9
11% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.3
78% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback